docs: add file upload parse success timing design and plan
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
|
||||
# 流水文件解析成功状态延后到流水入库完成设计
|
||||
|
||||
## 概述
|
||||
|
||||
调整流水文件上传异步处理链路中“解析成功”的业务含义。
|
||||
|
||||
当前实现里,只要流水分析平台返回“解析成功且可确认账户”,系统就会立即把上传记录状态更新为 `parsed_success`,随后才执行步骤 7 获取流水数据并写入本地数据库。
|
||||
|
||||
本次设计将 `parsed_success` 的含义收紧为:
|
||||
|
||||
- 流水分析平台解析成功
|
||||
- 步骤 7 获取流水数据成功
|
||||
- 流水数据成功写入本地数据库
|
||||
|
||||
在步骤 7 完成前,页面继续显示“解析中”。
|
||||
|
||||
## 背景
|
||||
|
||||
### 当前现状
|
||||
|
||||
当前核心逻辑位于 `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java`:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 上传文件到流水分析平台
|
||||
2. 轮询解析状态
|
||||
3. 调用上传状态接口判断是否解析成功
|
||||
4. 立即更新 `ccdi_file_upload_record.file_status = parsed_success`
|
||||
5. 再调用 `fetchAndSaveBankStatements(...)` 获取流水并入库
|
||||
|
||||
这会产生两个问题:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 前端会看到“解析成功”,但数据库里的流水可能还没有写完
|
||||
2. 步骤 7 失败时,记录可能先显示成功,随后又因为异常被改成失败,状态语义不稳定
|
||||
|
||||
### 前端约束
|
||||
|
||||
当前前端只识别以下四种状态:
|
||||
|
||||
- `uploading`
|
||||
- `parsing`
|
||||
- `parsed_success`
|
||||
- `parsed_failed`
|
||||
|
||||
本次需求明确要求:
|
||||
|
||||
- 不新增前端状态
|
||||
- 当步骤 6 已经确认平台解析成功,但步骤 7 尚未完成时,页面继续显示“解析中”
|
||||
|
||||
## 方案对比
|
||||
|
||||
### 方案一:仅后移 `parsed_success` 更新时机
|
||||
|
||||
做法:
|
||||
|
||||
- 步骤 6 解析成功后,不更新状态
|
||||
- 执行步骤 7
|
||||
- 步骤 7 执行结束后,再更新为 `parsed_success`
|
||||
|
||||
优点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 改动最小
|
||||
- 前端和数据库状态枚举都不需要调整
|
||||
|
||||
缺点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 当前 `fetchAndSaveBankStatements(...)` 没有显式返回成功或失败结果
|
||||
- 方法内部存在“记录异常后继续处理”的行为,容易把部分失败误判为成功
|
||||
|
||||
### 方案二:后移成功状态,并让步骤 7 返回明确执行结果
|
||||
|
||||
做法:
|
||||
|
||||
- 步骤 6 只确认“平台解析成功且可以获取流水”
|
||||
- 记录状态继续保持 `parsing`
|
||||
- 步骤 7 返回结构化结果,例如 `success`、`savedCount`、`errorMessage`
|
||||
- 只有步骤 7 明确成功后,才更新 `parsed_success`
|
||||
- 步骤 7 任一关键失败,则更新为 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
|
||||
优点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 状态语义完整且稳定
|
||||
- 能避免“伪成功”
|
||||
- 与当前前端状态模型兼容
|
||||
|
||||
缺点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 需要对步骤 7 做一定重构
|
||||
|
||||
### 方案三:拆分为解析状态和入库状态两个维度
|
||||
|
||||
做法:
|
||||
|
||||
- 新增“解析状态”和“入库状态”两个字段
|
||||
- 前端组合展示
|
||||
|
||||
优点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 状态表达最完整
|
||||
|
||||
缺点:
|
||||
|
||||
- 涉及数据库、后端查询统计、前端状态映射等多处改动
|
||||
- 超出本次需求范围
|
||||
|
||||
## 最终方案
|
||||
|
||||
采用方案二。
|
||||
|
||||
### 核心决策
|
||||
|
||||
1. `parsed_success` 只表示“流水数据已经成功入库”
|
||||
2. 步骤 6 解析成功后,记录状态继续保持 `parsing`
|
||||
3. 步骤 7 必须显式返回成功或失败结果
|
||||
4. 步骤 7 失败时,将上传记录更新为 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
5. 步骤 7 失败时,清理本次 `logId` 对应的已落库流水,避免半成品数据残留
|
||||
|
||||
## 详细设计
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. 主流程状态流转
|
||||
|
||||
调整 `processFileAsync(...)` 的状态流转如下:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 初始创建记录时为 `uploading`
|
||||
2. 文件上传到流水分析平台成功后,更新为 `parsing`
|
||||
3. 轮询解析完成
|
||||
4. 调用文件上传状态接口判断平台是否解析成功
|
||||
5. 若平台解析失败,更新为 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
6. 若平台解析成功,不更新为 `parsed_success`,继续保持 `parsing`
|
||||
7. 执行步骤 7 获取流水并入库
|
||||
8. 步骤 7 成功后,一次性更新:
|
||||
- `file_status = parsed_success`
|
||||
- `enterprise_names`
|
||||
- `account_nos`
|
||||
- 清空可能残留的 `error_message`
|
||||
9. 步骤 7 失败后,更新:
|
||||
- `file_status = parsed_failed`
|
||||
- `error_message = 失败原因`
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. 步骤 7 返回结构化结果
|
||||
|
||||
将 `fetchAndSaveBankStatements(Long projectId, Integer groupId, Integer logId)` 从 `void` 改为返回结构化结果对象。
|
||||
|
||||
建议新增内部结果对象,例如:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@Data
|
||||
private static class FetchBankStatementResult {
|
||||
private boolean success;
|
||||
private int totalCount;
|
||||
private int savedCount;
|
||||
private String errorMessage;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
返回语义建议如下:
|
||||
|
||||
- `success = true`
|
||||
- 已成功完成全部分页拉取和数据库落库
|
||||
- `savedCount` 为实际保存条数
|
||||
- `success = false`
|
||||
- 任一关键步骤失败
|
||||
- `errorMessage` 写明失败原因
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. 步骤 7 的成功判定
|
||||
|
||||
步骤 7 需同时满足以下条件才算成功:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 首次 `getBankStatement` 请求成功返回
|
||||
2. 分页总数计算正常
|
||||
3. 所有分页请求成功完成
|
||||
4. 所有批量插入操作成功完成
|
||||
5. 最终保存条数与已拉取条数一致
|
||||
|
||||
其中 `totalCount = 0` 的场景按成功处理,原因如下:
|
||||
|
||||
- 平台已经解析成功
|
||||
- 业务上允许“解析成功但无流水”
|
||||
- 否则记录会长期停留在 `parsing` 或被错误标记为失败
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. 步骤 7 的失败处理
|
||||
|
||||
当前实现中,分页循环内部发生异常后会记录日志并继续下一页。该行为不适用于本次状态语义。
|
||||
|
||||
调整后规则:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 首次查询总数失败,直接返回失败
|
||||
2. 任一分页请求失败,直接返回失败
|
||||
3. 任一批量插入失败,直接返回失败
|
||||
4. 返回失败前,清理当前 `logId` 已写入的流水数据
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. 半成品流水清理
|
||||
|
||||
`ccdi_bank_statement` 已存在 `batch_id` 字段,且当前实体 `CcdiBankStatement.batchId` 已映射该字段。
|
||||
|
||||
因此步骤 7 中应确保每条流水都带上本次上传的 `logId`:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
statement.setProjectId(projectId);
|
||||
statement.setBatchId(logId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
同时在 `CcdiBankStatementMapper` 中新增清理接口,例如:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
int deleteByProjectIdAndBatchId(@Param("projectId") Long projectId,
|
||||
@Param("batchId") Integer batchId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
用于在步骤 7 失败时删除本次已插入的流水,避免出现“部分落库但上传记录失败”的脏数据。
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. 为什么不使用长事务
|
||||
|
||||
不建议把步骤 7 做成覆盖远程接口调用和全部分页落库的单个数据库事务,原因如下:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 远程接口调用时间不可控
|
||||
2. 全量分页获取可能持续较久
|
||||
3. 长事务会占用数据库连接并增加锁持有时间
|
||||
|
||||
因此本次采用“显式成功判定 + 失败补偿清理”的方式,而不是“长事务回滚”。
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响范围
|
||||
|
||||
### 后端
|
||||
|
||||
- `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java`
|
||||
- `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/mapper/CcdiBankStatementMapper.java`
|
||||
- `ccdi-project/src/main/resources/mapper/ccdi/project/CcdiBankStatementMapper.xml`
|
||||
|
||||
### 测试
|
||||
|
||||
- 新增 `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java`
|
||||
|
||||
### 前端
|
||||
|
||||
无须改动。
|
||||
|
||||
当前前端的 `parsing` 状态即可承载“平台解析成功但流水尚未入库完成”的阶段。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试设计
|
||||
|
||||
至少覆盖以下场景:
|
||||
|
||||
1. 平台解析成功,步骤 7 全量拉取并入库成功,最终状态应为 `parsed_success`
|
||||
2. 平台解析成功,但首次获取流水总数失败,最终状态应为 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
3. 分页处理中途失败,最终状态应为 `parsed_failed`,且已写入流水被清理
|
||||
4. 批量插入失败,最终状态应为 `parsed_failed`,且已写入流水被清理
|
||||
5. `totalCount = 0`,最终状态应为 `parsed_success`
|
||||
6. 平台解析失败,保持现有失败路径
|
||||
|
||||
## 风险与缓解
|
||||
|
||||
| 风险 | 影响 | 缓解方案 |
|
||||
|------|------|----------|
|
||||
| 步骤 7 重构后改变现有异常处理行为 | 中 | 使用单元测试锁定成功、失败、零数据三类分支 |
|
||||
| 清理逻辑误删其他流水 | 高 | 删除条件必须同时绑定 `projectId` 和 `batchId(logId)` |
|
||||
| 失败原因不清晰 | 中 | 统一由步骤 7 返回明确 `errorMessage`,最终写入 `ccdi_file_upload_record.error_message` |
|
||||
|
||||
## 验收标准
|
||||
|
||||
1. 当流水平台解析成功但本地仍在入库时,上传记录保持 `parsing`
|
||||
2. 只有本地流水入库完成后,上传记录才变为 `parsed_success`
|
||||
3. 任一步骤 7 失败,上传记录为 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
4. 步骤 7 失败后,不残留本次 `logId` 的半成品流水
|
||||
5. 前端无需新增状态,现有页面展示符合预期
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
|
||||
# 流水文件解析成功状态延后到流水入库完成 Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** 让流水文件上传记录只有在步骤 7 获取并保存流水数据成功后才更新为 `parsed_success`,在此之前继续显示 `parsing`。
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:** 重构 `CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl` 的步骤 7,使其返回结构化执行结果而不是吞异常;主流程基于该结果决定最终状态。使用 `ccdi_bank_statement.batch_id` 绑定本次上传 `logId`,在步骤 7 失败时通过 Mapper 补偿删除本次已写入流水,避免半成品数据残留。
|
||||
|
||||
**Tech Stack:** Java 21, Spring Boot 3, MyBatis Plus, JUnit 5, Mockito(来自 `spring-boot-starter-test`)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 1: 为状态延后规则编写服务层失败测试
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- Create: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java`
|
||||
- Modify: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java:340-619`
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
|
||||
|
||||
在新测试类中先写“平台解析成功但步骤 7 失败时,记录最终为 `parsed_failed`”的测试。使用 Mockito mock 以下依赖:
|
||||
|
||||
- `LsfxAnalysisClient`
|
||||
- `CcdiFileUploadRecordMapper`
|
||||
- `CcdiBankStatementMapper`
|
||||
|
||||
示例骨架:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
|
||||
class CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@InjectMocks
|
||||
private CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl service;
|
||||
|
||||
@Mock
|
||||
private CcdiFileUploadRecordMapper recordMapper;
|
||||
|
||||
@Mock
|
||||
private CcdiProjectMapper projectMapper;
|
||||
|
||||
@Mock
|
||||
private LsfxAnalysisClient lsfxClient;
|
||||
|
||||
@Mock
|
||||
private CcdiBankStatementMapper bankStatementMapper;
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void processFileAsync_shouldKeepParsingUntilBankStatementsSaved() {
|
||||
// arrange
|
||||
// mock 上传成功、轮询完成、状态接口解析成功
|
||||
// mock getBankStatement 首次调用抛异常
|
||||
// act
|
||||
// assert
|
||||
verify(recordMapper, never()).updateById(argThat(record ->
|
||||
"parsed_success".equals(record.getFileStatus())));
|
||||
verify(recordMapper).updateById(argThat(record ->
|
||||
"parsed_failed".equals(record.getFileStatus())));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest#processFileAsync_shouldKeepParsingUntilBankStatementsSaved
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- FAIL
|
||||
- 失败原因应体现当前实现会先更新 `parsed_success`,或测试类尚未编译通过
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Write a second failing test for the success path**
|
||||
|
||||
补一条成功路径测试,验证步骤 7 成功后才更新为 `parsed_success`:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void processFileAsync_shouldMarkSuccessAfterBankStatementsSaved() {
|
||||
// mock 上传成功、解析成功、getBankStatement 返回 totalCount=0
|
||||
// 执行后应只在步骤7完成后出现 parsed_success
|
||||
verify(recordMapper).updateById(argThat(record ->
|
||||
"parsed_success".equals(record.getFileStatus())));
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Run both tests to verify they fail**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- FAIL
|
||||
- 至少一条断言失败,证明当前实现不符合新设计
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 5: Commit**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git add ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java
|
||||
git commit -m "test(ccdi-project): add file upload status transition tests"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 2: 重构步骤 7 返回结果对象并延后成功状态更新
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- Modify: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java:340-619`
|
||||
- Test: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java`
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Add a result object inside the service**
|
||||
|
||||
在 `CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl` 内新增私有静态结果类:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@Data
|
||||
private static class FetchBankStatementResult {
|
||||
private boolean success;
|
||||
private int totalCount;
|
||||
private int savedCount;
|
||||
private String errorMessage;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Change the fetch method signature**
|
||||
|
||||
把:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
private void fetchAndSaveBankStatements(Long projectId, Integer groupId, Integer logId)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
改为:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
private FetchBankStatementResult fetchAndSaveBankStatements(Long projectId, Integer groupId, Integer logId)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Return explicit failure instead of swallowing exceptions**
|
||||
|
||||
把当前“记录错误后继续下一页”的逻辑改成显式失败返回。例如:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
result.setSuccess(false);
|
||||
result.setErrorMessage("获取或保存流水数据失败: " + e.getMessage());
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Delay `parsed_success` update until the fetch result succeeds**
|
||||
|
||||
把 `processFileAsync(...)` 中当前这段提前成功逻辑:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
record.setFileStatus("parsed_success");
|
||||
record.setEnterpriseNames(enterpriseNamesStr);
|
||||
record.setAccountNos(accountNosStr);
|
||||
recordMapper.updateById(record);
|
||||
|
||||
fetchAndSaveBankStatements(projectId, lsfxProjectId, logId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
改成:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
FetchBankStatementResult fetchResult = fetchAndSaveBankStatements(projectId, lsfxProjectId, logId);
|
||||
if (!fetchResult.isSuccess()) {
|
||||
record.setFileStatus("parsed_failed");
|
||||
record.setErrorMessage(fetchResult.getErrorMessage());
|
||||
recordMapper.updateById(record);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
record.setFileStatus("parsed_success");
|
||||
record.setEnterpriseNames(enterpriseNamesStr);
|
||||
record.setAccountNos(accountNosStr);
|
||||
record.setErrorMessage(null);
|
||||
recordMapper.updateById(record);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 5: Handle the zero-data path explicitly**
|
||||
|
||||
在首次总数查询后,若 `totalCount == null || totalCount <= 0`,返回成功结果:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
result.setSuccess(true);
|
||||
result.setTotalCount(0);
|
||||
result.setSavedCount(0);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 6: Run targeted tests**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- PASS
|
||||
- 新增的状态延后测试全部通过
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 7: Commit**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git add ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java
|
||||
git commit -m "refactor(ccdi-project): delay parsed success until bank statements saved"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 3: 为本次上传绑定 batchId 并补偿清理半成品流水
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- Modify: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java:527-619`
|
||||
- Modify: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/mapper/CcdiBankStatementMapper.java:15-23`
|
||||
- Modify: `ccdi-project/src/main/resources/mapper/ccdi/project/CcdiBankStatementMapper.xml:62-87`
|
||||
- Test: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java`
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Attach the upload logId to each statement**
|
||||
|
||||
在流水转换循环内补齐:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
statement.setProjectId(projectId);
|
||||
statement.setBatchId(logId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Add the cleanup mapper method**
|
||||
|
||||
在 `CcdiBankStatementMapper.java` 中新增:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
int deleteByProjectIdAndBatchId(@Param("projectId") Long projectId,
|
||||
@Param("batchId") Integer batchId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
并在 XML 中实现:
|
||||
|
||||
```xml
|
||||
<delete id="deleteByProjectIdAndBatchId">
|
||||
delete from ccdi_bank_statement
|
||||
where project_id = #{projectId}
|
||||
and batch_id = #{batchId}
|
||||
</delete>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Call cleanup before returning failure**
|
||||
|
||||
在 `fetchAndSaveBankStatements(...)` 的失败分支中调用:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
bankStatementMapper.deleteByProjectIdAndBatchId(projectId, logId);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
只允许使用 `projectId + logId(batchId)` 双条件,避免误删其他批次数据。
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Write a failing cleanup test**
|
||||
|
||||
在测试类中新增:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void processFileAsync_shouldCleanupInsertedStatementsWhenFetchFails() {
|
||||
// mock 某页或某批插入失败
|
||||
// assert deleteByProjectIdAndBatchId(projectId, logId) 被调用
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 5: Run the new test**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest#processFileAsync_shouldCleanupInsertedStatementsWhenFetchFails
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- 先 FAIL,再在实现后 PASS
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 6: Run the module tests**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiBankStatementTest,CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- PASS
|
||||
- 旧的 `CcdiBankStatementTest` 不回归
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 7: Commit**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git add ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/mapper/CcdiBankStatementMapper.java ccdi-project/src/main/resources/mapper/ccdi/project/CcdiBankStatementMapper.xml ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java
|
||||
git commit -m "fix(ccdi-project): cleanup partial bank statements on upload failure"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 4: 回归验证并整理交付
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- Modify: `docs/plans/2026-03-09-file-upload-parse-success-after-bank-statement-design.md`
|
||||
- Modify: `docs/plans/2026-03-09-file-upload-parse-success-after-bank-statement.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Run final verification**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mvn test -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiBankStatementTest,CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- PASS
|
||||
- 无编译错误
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Inspect git diff**
|
||||
|
||||
Run:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git diff -- ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/mapper/CcdiBankStatementMapper.java ccdi-project/src/main/resources/mapper/ccdi/project/CcdiBankStatementMapper.xml ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- 只包含状态时机调整、结果对象、清理接口和测试
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Update docs if implementation deviates**
|
||||
|
||||
若实现中出现与设计或计划不一致的细节,及时回写到这两份文档,避免文档失真。
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Commit**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git add ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImpl.java ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/mapper/CcdiBankStatementMapper.java ccdi-project/src/main/resources/mapper/ccdi/project/CcdiBankStatementMapper.xml ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiFileUploadServiceImplTest.java docs/plans/2026-03-09-file-upload-parse-success-after-bank-statement-design.md docs/plans/2026-03-09-file-upload-parse-success-after-bank-statement.md
|
||||
git commit -m "docs: finalize file upload parse success timing plan"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] 服务测试已覆盖“成功延后”和“步骤 7 失败”场景
|
||||
- [ ] `fetchAndSaveBankStatements(...)` 改为返回结构化结果
|
||||
- [ ] 步骤 7 完成前记录状态保持 `parsing`
|
||||
- [ ] 步骤 7 成功后才更新 `parsed_success`
|
||||
- [ ] 步骤 7 失败后更新 `parsed_failed`
|
||||
- [ ] 本次 `logId` 对应流水写入 `batch_id`
|
||||
- [ ] 步骤 7 失败时清理本次半成品流水
|
||||
- [ ] `totalCount = 0` 场景按成功处理
|
||||
- [ ] `ccdi-project` 相关测试通过
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user