补充项目列表重新分析实施计划

2026-03-24 12:20:58 +08:00
parent b0b4cc8fe5
commit aeeec79c17
3 changed files with 460 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/docs/plans/backend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-implementation.md
+++ b/docs/plans/backend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-implementation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+# Project List Reanalyze Backend Implementation Plan
+
+> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (if subagents available) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
+
+**Goal:** 确认并验证项目管理列表“重新分析”复用现有项目级重打标链路即可满足“重新打标并重新计算人数”的后端要求，不新增额外接口或并行逻辑。
+
+**Architecture:** 后端实现保持不改代码的最短路径，继续复用 `CcdiBankTagController -> ProjectBankTagRebuildCoordinator -> CcdiBankTagServiceImpl -> CcdiProjectOverviewServiceImpl` 这条现有链路。实施工作集中在边界核验、接口契约回归、关键测试运行和实施记录沉淀，确保前端接入后不会因为后端口径不清而额外返工。
+
+**Tech Stack:** Java 21, Spring Boot 3, JUnit 5, Mockito, Maven
+
+---
+
+### Task 1: 核验现有后端链路已覆盖需求
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/plans/backend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-implementation.md`
+- Reference: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/controller/CcdiBankTagController.java`
+- Reference: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/ProjectBankTagRebuildCoordinator.java`
+- Reference: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiBankTagServiceImpl.java`
+- Reference: `ccdi-project/src/main/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiProjectOverviewServiceImpl.java`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Write the acceptance checklist**
+
+先在计划中明确本次后端必须被验证的四个事实：
+
+- `POST /ccdi/project/tags/rebuild` 支持只传 `projectId`
+- 手动提交后项目状态会切换为 `3-打标中`
+- 打标成功后会调用 `refreshOverviewEmployeeResults(projectId, operator)`
+- `refreshOverviewEmployeeResults(...)` 会同步刷新高/中/低风险人数
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run repository grep to verify the call chain**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+rg -n "refreshOverviewEmployeeResults|submitManual|/rebuild|updateProjectStatus\\(projectId, CcdiProjectStatusConstants.TAGGING" ccdi-project/src/main/java -S
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- 能同时看到控制器入口、协调器提交流程、`TAGGING` 状态切换和人数重算调用
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Keep implementation minimal**
+
+如果上述四个事实都成立，则明确记录：
+
+- 本次后端不新增接口
+- 本次后端不新增服务分支
+- 本次后端不新增人数重算调用
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git add docs/plans/backend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-implementation.md
+git commit -m "补充项目列表重新分析后端实施计划"
+```
+
+### Task 2: 运行关键后端测试锁定现有契约
+
+**Files:**
+- Test: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/controller/CcdiBankTagControllerTest.java`
+- Test: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/ProjectBankTagRebuildCoordinatorTest.java`
+- Test: `ccdi-project/src/test/java/com/ruoyi/ccdi/project/service/impl/CcdiBankTagServiceRiskCountRefreshTest.java`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Run controller and coordinator contract tests**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+mvn -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiBankTagControllerTest,ProjectBankTagRebuildCoordinatorTest test
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `PASS`
+- 能证明手动重打标入口、运行中防重提交流程和归档保护逻辑都已存在
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run risk count refresh test**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+mvn -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiBankTagServiceRiskCountRefreshTest test
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `PASS`
+- 能证明重打标成功后会刷新员工结果并同步更新项目风险人数
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: If any test fails, inspect before changing code**
+
+若失败，先检查是否为环境或依赖问题，再决定是否需要补充代码；本次默认目标是不产生新的后端代码改动。
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git status --short
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- 若仅运行测试无文件变化，则本任务无需代码提交
+
+### Task 3: 补充后端验证记录与边界说明
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: `docs/tests/records/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-verification.md`
+- Create: `docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-record.md`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Write verification skeleton**
+
+创建后端验证记录，至少包含：
+
+```markdown
+# 项目管理列表重新分析后端验证记录
+
+## 验证范围
+- 手动重打标接口可直接复用于列表页
+- 重打标开始后项目进入打标中
+- 重打标成功后自动重算项目风险人数
+- 运行中任务和归档项目保留既有后端保护
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Record exact commands and results**
+
+把实际执行的测试命令和结果写入验证记录：
+
+```bash
+mvn -pl ccdi-project -Dtest=CcdiBankTagControllerTest,ProjectBankTagRebuildCoordinatorTest,CcdiBankTagServiceRiskCountRefreshTest test
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- 记录通过或失败原因
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Write the implementation record**
+
+在 `docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-record.md` 中写明：
+
+- 为什么本次后端不需要改代码
+- 现有复用链路覆盖了哪些需求
+- 已验证的保护场景有哪些
+- 后续仅由前端接线即可进入实现阶段
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git add docs/tests/records/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-verification.md docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-record.md
+git commit -m "补充项目列表重新分析后端验证记录"
+```
--- a/docs/plans/frontend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-implementation.md
+++ b/docs/plans/frontend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-implementation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+# Project List Reanalyze Frontend Implementation Plan
+
+> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (if subagents available) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
+
+**Goal:** 让项目管理列表中的“重新分析”按钮真正调用现有项目重打标接口，提交成功后立即刷新列表并展示“打标中”状态。
+
+**Architecture:** 复用现有 `ruoyi-ui/src/api/ccdiProject.js` 作为 API 收口点，在 `ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/index.vue` 中把 `handleReAnalyze` 从本地提示改为真实异步提交逻辑，并将按钮级提交态透传到 `ProjectTable.vue`。测试采用现有前端仓库里“读取源码断言文案/调用痕迹”的轻量风格，补充一条接口接线测试和一条交互状态测试。
+
+**Tech Stack:** Vue 2, Element UI, Axios request wrapper, Node, npm
+
+---
+
+### Task 1: 先锁定“重新分析”接口契约
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `ruoyi-ui/src/api/ccdiProject.js`
+- Test: `ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-api.test.js`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing test**
+
+新增一个轻量源码契约测试，锁定新增接口会调用正确的后端地址和请求方式：
+
+```javascript
+const assert = require("assert");
+const fs = require("fs");
+const path = require("path");
+
+const apiPath = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../src/api/ccdiProject.js");
+const source = fs.readFileSync(apiPath, "utf8");
+
+assert(
+  source.includes("export function rebuildProjectTags(data)"),
+  "应新增项目重新分析接口封装"
+);
+
+assert(
+  source.includes("url: '/ccdi/project/tags/rebuild'"),
+  "重新分析接口应指向项目标签重打标地址"
+);
+
+assert(
+  source.includes("method: 'post'"),
+  "重新分析接口应使用 POST 请求"
+);
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-api.test.js
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `FAIL`
+- 原因是当前 `ccdiProject.js` 还没有 `rebuildProjectTags` 接口
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
+
+在 `ruoyi-ui/src/api/ccdiProject.js` 中新增：
+
+```javascript
+export function rebuildProjectTags(data) {
+  return request({
+    url: '/ccdi/project/tags/rebuild',
+    method: 'post',
+    data
+  })
+}
+```
+
+约束：
+
+- 不新建独立 API 文件
+- 不改动现有其他接口命名和返回处理方式
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-api.test.js
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `PASS`
+
+- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git add ruoyi-ui/src/api/ccdiProject.js ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-api.test.js
+git commit -m "新增项目列表重新分析前端接口"
+```
+
+### Task 2: 将列表页重新分析按钮接入真实异步流程
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/index.vue`
+- Modify: `ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/components/ProjectTable.vue`
+- Test: `ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing test**
+
+新增一条交互接线测试，至少锁定以下行为：
+
+```javascript
+const assert = require("assert");
+const fs = require("fs");
+const path = require("path");
+
+const pagePath = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../src/views/ccdiProject/index.vue");
+const tablePath = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../src/views/ccdiProject/components/ProjectTable.vue");
+const pageSource = fs.readFileSync(pagePath, "utf8");
+const tableSource = fs.readFileSync(tablePath, "utf8");
+
+assert(
+  pageSource.includes("rebuildProjectTags({ projectId: row.projectId })"),
+  "重新分析应调用真实重打标接口"
+);
+
+assert(
+  pageSource.includes("this.$modal.msgSuccess(\"已开始重新分析\")") ||
+  pageSource.includes("this.$modal.msgSuccess('已开始重新分析')"),
+  "重新分析成功提示应统一为已开始重新分析"
+);
+
+assert(
+  /finally\\s*\\(.*?this\\.getList\\(/s.test(pageSource) || pageSource.includes("this.getList()"),
+  "重新分析成功后应刷新列表"
+);
+
+assert(
+  tableSource.includes(":loading=\"reAnalyzeLoadingMap[String(scope.row.projectId)]\"") ||
+  tableSource.includes(":loading=\"reAnalyzeLoadingMap[scope.row.projectId]\""),
+  "表格中的重新分析按钮应支持提交态"
+);
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `FAIL`
+- 原因是当前 `handleReAnalyze` 仍然只是 `console.log` 加本地提示
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
+
+在 `ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/index.vue` 中：
+
+1. 引入 `rebuildProjectTags`
+2. 在 `data()` 中新增按钮级提交态，例如：
+
+```javascript
+reAnalyzeLoadingMap: {}
+```
+
+3. 将 `handleReAnalyze(row)` 改为：
+
+```javascript
+async handleReAnalyze(row) {
+  const projectKey = String(row.projectId)
+  if (this.reAnalyzeLoadingMap[projectKey]) {
+    return
+  }
+  this.$set(this.reAnalyzeLoadingMap, projectKey, true)
+  try {
+    await rebuildProjectTags({ projectId: row.projectId })
+    this.$modal.msgSuccess("已开始重新分析")
+    this.getList()
+  } catch (error) {
+    const message = error && error.message ? error.message : "重新分析失败，请稍后重试"
+    this.$modal.msgError(message)
+  } finally {
+    this.$set(this.reAnalyzeLoadingMap, projectKey, false)
+  }
+}
+```
+
+在 `ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/components/ProjectTable.vue` 中：
+
+1. 新增 `reAnalyzeLoadingMap` 属性
+2. 给“重新分析”按钮增加：
+
+```vue
+:loading="reAnalyzeLoadingMap[String(scope.row.projectId)]"
+:disabled="reAnalyzeLoadingMap[String(scope.row.projectId)]"
+```
+
+约束：
+
+- 只对“重新分析”按钮加提交态
+- 不引入轮询
+- 不新增确认弹窗
+- 不修改按钮显示范围，仍只在 `status === '1'` 时显示
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- `PASS`
+
+- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git add ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/index.vue ruoyi-ui/src/views/ccdiProject/components/ProjectTable.vue ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js
+git commit -m "实现项目列表重新分析交互"
+```
+
+### Task 3: 补齐失败提示与回归验证
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js`
+- Create: `docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-record.md`
+
+- [ ] **Step 1: Extend the failing test for error handling**
+
+在 `project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js` 中继续锁定以下文案与行为：
+
+```javascript
+assert(
+  pageSource.includes("重新分析失败，请稍后重试"),
+  "重新分析失败时应有统一兜底提示"
+);
+
+assert(
+  pageSource.includes("error.message"),
+  "有明确业务异常时应优先透传后端返回文案"
+);
+```
+
+- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests to verify the final contract**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-api.test.js
+node tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- 两条测试都 `PASS`
+
+- [ ] **Step 3: Run frontend build smoke check**
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+cd ruoyi-ui
+npm run build:prod
+```
+
+Expected:
+
+- 构建成功
+- 不引入新的 ESLint 或模板编译错误
+
+- [ ] **Step 4: Write the implementation record**
+
+新增实施记录 `docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-record.md`，覆盖：
+
+- 新增项目重分析 API 封装
+- 列表页“重新分析”按钮接入真实接口
+- 按钮提交态与成功/失败提示
+- 执行过的测试命令和结果
+
+- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+git add ruoyi-ui/tests/unit/project-list-reanalyze-flow.test.js docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-record.md
+git commit -m "补充项目列表重新分析前端实施记录"
+```
--- a/docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-plan-record.md
+++ b/docs/reports/implementation/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-plan-record.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# 2026-03-24 项目管理列表重新分析实施计划产出记录
+
+## 本次产出
+
+- 新增后端实施计划 `docs/plans/backend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-backend-implementation.md`
+- 新增前端实施计划 `docs/plans/frontend/2026-03-24-project-list-reanalyze-frontend-implementation.md`
+
+## 关键结论
+
+- 前端实施计划负责真实接线、按钮提交态和单测补充
+- 后端实施计划负责现有链路验证和边界确认，不新增多余接口
+- 本次仍遵循“最短路径实现”，不引入轮询、进度条或额外重算接口
+
+## 后续动作
+
+- 进入实现阶段时，先执行前端实施计划
+- 后端按计划完成关键测试与验证记录沉淀