fix: 修复中介导入成功条数计算错误
问题: - 导入成功条数显示为负数 - 原因:成功数量计算使用 validRecords.size() - failures.size() - 但没有使用实际的数据库操作返回值 修复: - saveBatchWithUpsert 和 saveBatch 方法现在返回 int - 累加实际的数据库影响行数 - 使用 actualSuccessCount 变量跟踪真实成功数量 影响范围: - CcdiIntermediaryPersonImportServiceImpl - CcdiIntermediaryEntityImportServiceImpl
This commit is contained in:
37
doc/test-data/purchase_transaction/node_modules/jszip/deps.js
generated
vendored
Normal file
37
doc/test-data/purchase_transaction/node_modules/jszip/deps.js
generated
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
"use strict";
|
||||
|
||||
const madge = require("madge");
|
||||
const path = require("path");
|
||||
const ts = require("typescript");
|
||||
|
||||
const DIR = "./lib";
|
||||
|
||||
async function main() {
|
||||
const tsconfigPath = ts.findConfigFile("./", ts.sys.fileExists);
|
||||
const tsconfig = ts.readConfigFile(tsconfigPath, ts.sys.readFile).config;
|
||||
const parsedConfig = ts.parseJsonConfigFileContent(tsconfig, ts.sys, "./");
|
||||
const typedPaths = parsedConfig.fileNames.map(filename => path.resolve("./", filename));
|
||||
|
||||
const excludeTypedPaths = path => !typedPaths.includes(path);
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await madge(DIR, {
|
||||
dependencyFilter: excludeTypedPaths
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const untypedLeaves = res.leaves().map(filename => path.resolve(DIR, filename)).filter(excludeTypedPaths);
|
||||
if (untypedLeaves.length) {
|
||||
console.log("Convert next:");
|
||||
console.log(untypedLeaves.join("\n"));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
console.log("No untyped leaf dependencies found.");
|
||||
console.log("Try looking at circular dependencies, or the image to decide what to convert next:");
|
||||
const untypedCircular = res.circular().flat().map(filename => path.resolve(DIR, filename)).filter(excludeTypedPaths);
|
||||
console.log(untypedCircular.join("\n"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const imagePath = await res.image("graph.svg");
|
||||
console.log();
|
||||
console.log("Image written to " + imagePath);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main();
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user